The project's 2026 conference programme closed with a quantitative study of judicial decision-making.
2026. 09. 15.
Findings from 19 countries showed that political power and institutional design shape annulment practice together.
2026. 09. 05.
A virtual presentation connected appointment procedures with judicial outcomes in a hybrid Dublin panel.
2026. 07. 01.
News
The project's 2026 conference programme closed with a quantitative study of judicial decision-making.
2026.09.15.
Findings from 19 countries showed that political power and institutional design shape annulment practice together.
2026.09.05.
A virtual presentation connected appointment procedures with judicial outcomes in a hybrid Dublin panel.
2026.07.01.
Empirical evidence linked institutional rules to observable patterns in constitutional court decisions.
2026.06.23.
A Belfast panel considered how constitutional courts respond when political pressure intensifies.
2026.06.20.
A new analysis of more than 25,000 decisions compared judicial assertiveness across 19 European constitutional courts.
2026.05.20.
Why do courts with comparable formal powers differ in how readily they annul legislation?
2026.01.18.
A book discussion and a paper on judicial dissent brought two strands of JUDICON-EU research to Prague.
2025.09.29.
JUDICON at the 2025 Global Summit on Constitutionalism conference.
2025.03.26.
More news